Suchergebnisse

Introduction. Within the boundaries of the onto- logical and personological turns in philosophy that are taking place today, the article proposes to look at the genesis and evolution of culture as a subject- subject situation of the dialogue of man and being, where the living (including man) and culture are the result of self-unfolding of being, self-knowledge by being itself, the process of which is carried out through what A. Badiou called the procedures of truth: poems, mathematics, politics and love. The purpose of the article is to show the dynamics of culture as part of the universe. Methods. The methodology is based on the Cartesian idea of the subject, phenomenology, the concept of I-subjectivity of A.V. Pavlov, A. Badiou's works and representatives of object-oriented ontol- ogy (G. Harman, K. Meissou, J. Bennett, R. Brassier). Scientific novelty of the study. The article consid- ers the procedures of truth proposed by A. Badiou as social practices that determine the existence of culture, the creative activity of a person, the con- struction by a person of the social sphere and the cognition/decoding of being. It is proposed to think of a person and the culture he creates as a result of self-knowledge and self-creation by being oneself. Results and conclusions. As a result, a conclusion is made about the ontological equality of a person because of his place in the general structure of being; about history as a movement from the loss of equality to its acquisition; about modernity and postmodernity as opposite forces inherent in any culture, associated with its variability; about the procedures of A. Badiou's truth as ways of knowing being by a person and being of oneself.

Introduction. The phenomenon of multitude is actively comprehended in the world and domestic philosophical, sociological and political science in order to obtain new knowledge about social pro- cesses. The concept originating from mathematics, which became a permanent feature of philoso- phy thanks to the works of A. Negri, M. Hardt, A. Badiou, J. Rancière, Ch. Mouffe, J. Butler and, of course, is closely related to the work of J. Deleuze and F. Guattari, still needs reflecting and popular- izing, and can also be used in constructing complex philosophical concepts. The purpose of the article is to show the phenom- enon of multitude which is an integral part of the permanent modernity theory as a tectonic force of socio-cultural variability, "operating" thanks to dialogue and the subject. Methods. The method- ology of the article is based on phenomenology, hermeneutics, the principle of complexity; its theoretical basis is the concept of modernity as A.V. Pavlov's I-subjectivity and the concept of perma- nent modernity. Scientific novelty of the research. The article reveals the political aspect of the permanent modernity concept associated with cultural and civilizational dynamics. The author gives a new interpretation of such concepts as "modern", "post- modern", "civilization", "culture"; proposes to take a fresh look at the hierarchy of these terms. Results and conclusions. As a result, the author concludes that the multitude is a set of agents grouped around the subject-idea and realizing the utopia of the subject in the political area through multifaceted interactions, due to which cultural dynamics occurs.

Introduction. In the Russian philosophical tradition, domestic philosophical concepts are rather poorly considered at the moment. In fact, there is no coverage of regional specific features: the problems that worried and united Russian philosophers within the boundaries of one or another temporalterritorial locality. The purpose of the article is to consider the views of the Tyumen philosopher-ethicist Yuri Mikhailovich Fedorov in the context of their relevance at present and in the context of a continuous research tradition. Methods. The author proceeds from the methods of hermeneutics, which are obligatory in this case, and also uses L. Laudan's theory of research traditions, M. Foucault's optics and the concept of permanent modernity. Scientific novelty of the research. The author clarifies Yu.M. Fedorov's views through the specified methodology, considering his works in the context of a continuing philosophical tradition, with a special emphasis on the methods of subjectification. Results and conclusions. Taking into consideration the results of analytical reading of Yu.M. Fedorov's key work "Universe of Morality", it is concluded that the author's concept, which combines the features of idealism, cosmism, structuralism, semiotics and existentialism, with some reservations (indicated in the article), suggests an adequate model of subjectification for a person of the XXI century.